2786 stories
·
0 followers

Gloves

1 Share

Affordable, cut-resistant hand protection

Whizard Handguard

These Spectra/Kevlar gloves are used in the restaurant industry to defend against knife and mandolin cuts, as well as handling trash that may have protruding bits of glass and fish bones. I read about them in a cooking magazine, and bought one glove after cutting myself on a mandolin.

find the glove allows for ample movement and dexterity. It’s definitely flexible enough to carve with and feels a lot like wearing a winter Thinsulate glove. These days, when I use the mandolin, I find I can get in closer for a few extra slices. Although the glove hits the blade, my hand’s always safe. My gloved hand has even survived an errant cleaver (Fortunately I didn’t hit myself not too hard).

I’ve used mine about five times a month for the past three years. I’ve washed it and haven’t noticed any deterioration, though it does feel a little stiffer at first. Bonus: The weave is much tighter than with a pricier chain mail glove, so it also seems better for guarding against knife pokes. — Steve Golden


Medieval-style hand protection

Chain Mail Glove

If you enjoy carving wood or just working with sharp tools, this glove can save you countless boxes of band-aids as well as a nice chunk of change – and gas money — from all the trips to the local emergency room for stitches. The chain mail (just like the type medieval knights and shark divers use) is a great safety tool that not only keeps you from slicing your hand open, but also makes you feel pretty tough while wearing it. Much more comfortable and easier to work with than any heavily-padded safety glove. These are similar to the butcher’s gloves and also those advertised for shucking oysters, but they’re half the price. — Josh G.


Tough kevlar work gloves

Tuffcoat Work Gloves

I was left about a dozen pairs of these rubber dipped kevlar gloves by the former owner of my house. Good thing, too! I’ve removed 4 crabapple trees, buried electrical cable, dug up hundreds of ferns, trimmed pine trees and done yardwork for the whole neighborhood. And these gloves look exactly like they did on day one.

That’s not to say they’re pretty, because they’re surely not, but they can stand up to all kinds of abuse and not seem any worse for the wear. The rubber is flexible enough to grip small objects like nails and screws yet plenty sturdy for sharp thorns and other pokey things. The yellow kevlar mesh on the top makes the gloves feel light and breathable. The gloves pull on and off very easily and they hug the wrists so not much dirt gets inside of them.

The colors may not be pretty but they help make them more visible when you’re looking for a pair in your crowded garage or basement. I gave away a few pairs before I realized how valuable they are. Now I just tell other people about them! — Matt O’Hara


Fleece-lined neoprene gloves

Glacier Gloves

The quest for warm hands in a cold demanding environment is a long and frustrating one. The general rule is it takes carrying three pairs of gloves to have one dry pair on your hands. I have not found that to be true with Glacier Gloves, which is hands down the best glove I have ever used. The 824BK is 2mm neoprene lined with a thin fleece nap on the inside; the two layers feel fused together somehow (not sewn or glued), which gives them a comfortable fit, allows easy on and off, and provides excellent dexterity.

I have bought several different waterproof gloves from various makers, including the previously-reviewed SealSkinz, other neoprene rubber gloves and a pair of thinsulate-filled gloves with a “waterproof” exterior. Some are OK and allow for moderate dexterity, but I find my hands get cold after working in the water and I then have to switch out to a different glove — and if you have to put some of them on with wet hands, forget it.

With the Glacier Glove, the Velcro strap secures them to your wrist, minimizes heat loss through the cuff, and minimizes water entry through the cuff. I find the cuff, when tucked inside the sleeve of your coat, also prevents rain water from running down your jacket and into the glove from the topside.

My hunting partner bought a pair years ago and was quick to brag about how warm and dry his hands were whenever we complained about how cold and wet ours were. I now wear mine while duck hunting and will generally keep my left glove on all day long, and swap between a thin shooter’s glove and my Glacier on the right (that’s just my preference; other hunters use them on both hands with no complaints). While I’ve only used these gloves while hunting, I would recommend them for any cold and wet environment. — Max Tullos


Warm hands during wet winters

Youngstown Waterproof Winter Plus Work Gloves

I received these gloves about six years ago from my wife, in one of those rare intersections of need and availability. It was Christmastime and I needed to shovel, so I broke these out and went to work. I never gave them a second thought, until I realized I had done a fair amount of ice chopping, opening the garage, and manipulating other things without ever removing the gloves. This is somewhat of a rarity for me since I usually cannot work in gloves. Fast-forward to spring, and I used them to protect my hands when chopping and stacking wood; working on the car; working in the garage. I *far extended* the prescribed use of these, despite the fact that they were winter gloves and waterproof. In a pinch, I’ve even used them when moving flaming logs in an outdoor fire pit.

A short word about the waterproofing: I tend to agree with other owners in that these aren’t strictly waterproof. If I was a long-line fisherman I may not use them. However, as a north Jersey resident who works on his cars, shovels snow, and builds snowmen for the kids, I can attest to their warmth and utility in the cold and wet.

With respect to function, they fit my slightly larger hand size well, and the back strap does seal in against cold and snow. The palms and fingers are textured and I am able to pick up bolts, thread nuts, small tools and sockets, and work with wrenches rather easily. The fingertips are boxed, not tapered, but in some ways the fingertips work to my advantage in picking up things on the ground.

When they get *really* dirty, you can toss them in the wash. The construction is such that the inner glove liner is not sewn to the shell, but it is a huge pain in the posterior to re-fit the glove components back to original fit. I used a wooden spoon and patience to eventually restore it to normal comfort. — Christopher Wanko


Tethered gloves

Glove Guards

The problem is keeping my work gloves with me at all times. I’ve tried putting grommets in the gloves and clipping them with a carabiner, but this isn’t as easy as it sounds and is a pain to do all over again when a glove gets lost or worn out.

Years ago I saw someone out there with a large battery-terminal clip holding his gloves, and I’ve been searching for a similar clip for years with no success. This year, though, I found these Glove Guards.

The clips have a “breakaway” feature, so that you won’t be trapped if your gloves get caught in machinery or something. This caused me some worry when my gloves got caught in the truck door and seemed to break away too easily but the two pieces of the clip reconnected with ease, and have continued to hold firm ever since.

At less than $5 apiece, I can wholeheartedly recommend getting several if keeping your gloves handy is important to you. — Bill Emmack

Read the whole story
huskerboy
44 minutes ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete

50 common interview questions and answers for 2026 (The ultimate guide)

1 Share
We sifted through tens of thousands of interview reviews to find the most common interview questions to help you prep for your next one.

Read the whole story
huskerboy
5 days ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete

Elon Musk Says the Tesla Model S and Model X Will Die Soon

1 Share
  • The Tesla Model S sedan and Model X SUV going out of production.
  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that if you want one of these models, "now would be the time to order it."
  • The Model S and Model X combined accounted for less than 3% of Tesla's total deliveries in 2025.

The Tesla Model S and Model X aren't long for this world. That's the news from Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who confirmed the demise of these EVs on the company's recent fourth-quarter earnings call.

"It's time to basically bring the Model S and X programs to an end," Musk said. "If you’re interested in buying a Model S and X, now would be the time to order it."

The Model S and Model X are the two oldest vehicles in Tesla's lineup; the Model S was originally launched way back in 2012 and the Model X followed a few years later. Since then, these vehicles have received several over-the-air tech updates, but only minor tweaks to the physical hardware. The last significant milestone came in 2021, when Tesla launched the high-performance Model S Plaid and Model X Plaid. You may remember the Model S Plaid from Edmunds U-Drags where it lost to both of its key rivals, the Lucid Air Sapphire and Porsche Taycan Turbo GT.

Sales of the Model S and Model X have suffered in recent years. Of the 1,636,129 vehicles Tesla delivered in 2025, 97% were the far more popular Model 3 and Model Y, both of which have recently been overhauled.

It's unclear exactly when production of the Model S and Model X will end. Following that, Musk said Tesla's factory in Fremont, California, will be retooled to build Optimus humanoid robots. Neat.

Read the whole story
huskerboy
5 days ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete

“IG is a drug”: Internal messages may doom Meta at social media addiction trial

1 Share

Anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and death. These can be the consequences for vulnerable kids who get addicted to social media, according to more than 1,000 personal injury lawsuits that seek to punish Meta and other platforms for allegedly prioritizing profits while downplaying child safety risks for years.

Social media companies have faced scrutiny before, with congressional hearings forcing CEOs to apologize, but until now, they've never had to convince a jury that they aren't liable for harming kids.

This week, the first high-profile lawsuit—considered a "bellwether" case that could set meaningful precedent in the hundreds of other complaints—goes to trial. That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
huskerboy
6 days ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete

Because coordination is expensive

1 Share

If you’ve ever worked at a larger organization, stop me if you’ve heard (or asked!) any of these questions:

  • “Why do we move so slowly as an organization? We need to figure out how to move more quickly.”
  • “Why do we work in silos? We need to figure out how to break out of these.”
  • “Why do we spend so much of our time in meetings? We need to explicitly set no-meeting days so we can actually get real work done.”
  • “Why do we maintain multiple solutions for solving what’s basically the same problem? We should just standardize on one solution instead of duplicating work like this.”
  • “Why do we have so many layers of management? We should remove layers and increase span of control.”
  • “Why are we constantly re-org’ing? Re-orgs so disruptive.”

(As an aside, my favorite “multiple solutions” example is workflow management systems. I suspect that every senior-level engineer has contributed code to at least one home-grown workflow management system in their career).

The answer to all of these questions is the same: because coordination is expensive. It requires significant effort for a group of people to work together to achieve a task that is too large for them to accomplish individually. And the more people that are involved, the higher that coordination effort grows. This is both “effort” in terms of difficulty (effortful as hard), and in terms of time (engineering effort, as measured in person-hours). This is why you see siloed work and multiple systems that seem to do the same thing. It’s because it requires less effort to work within your organization then to coordinate across organization, the incentive is to do localized work whenever possible, in order to reduce those costs.

Time spent in meetings is one aspect of this cost, which is something people acutely feel, because it deprives them of their individual work time. But the meeting time is still work, it’s just unsatisfying-feeling coordination work. When was the last time you talked about your participation in meetings in your annual performance review? Nobody gets promoted for attending meetings, but we humans need them to coordinate our work, and that’s why they keep happening. As organizations grow, they require more coordination, which means more resources being put into coordination mechanisms, like meetings and middle management. It’s like an organizational law of thermodynamics. It’s why you’ll hear ICs at larger organizations talk about Tanya Reilly’s notion of glue work so much. You’ll hear companies run “One <COMPANY NAME>” campaigns at larger companies as an attempt to improve coordination; I remember the One SendGrid campaign back when I worked there.

Comic by ex-Googler Manu Cornet, 2021-02-18

Because of the challenges of coordination, there’s a brisk market in coordination tools. Some examples off the top of my head include: Gantt charts, written specifications, Jira, Slack, daily stand-ups, OKRs, kanban boards, Asana, Linear, pull requests, email, Google docs, Zoom, I’m sure you could name dozens more, including some that are no longer with us. (Remember Google Wave?). Heck, both spoken and written language are the ultimately communication ur-tools.

And yet, despite the existence of all of those tools, it’s still hard to coordinate. Remember back in 2002 when Google experimented with eliminating engineering managers? (“That experiment lasted only a few months“). And then in 2015 when Zappos experimented with holacracy? (“Flat on paper, hierarchy in practice.“) I don’t blame them for trying different approaches, but I’m also not surprised that these experiments failed. Human coordination is just fundamentally difficult. There’s no one weird trick that is going to make the problem go away.

I think it’s notable that large companies try different strategies to try to manage ongoing coordination costs. Amazon is famous for using a decentralization strategy, they have historically operated almost like a federation of independent startups, and enforce coordination through software service interfaces, as described in Steve Yegge’s famous internal Google memo. Google, on the other hand, is famous for using an invest-heavily-in-centralized-tooling approach to coordination. But there are other types of coordination that are outside of the scope of these sorts of solutions, such as working on an initiative that involves work from multiple different teams and orgs. I haven’t worked inside of either Amazon or Google, so I don’t know how well things work in practice there, but I bet employees have some great stories!

During incidents, coordination becomes an acute problem, and we humans are pretty good at dealing with acute problems. The organization will explicitly invest in an incident manager on-call rotation to help manage those communication costs. But coordination is also a chronic problem in organizations, and we’re just not as good at dealing with chronic problems. The first step, though, is recognizing the problem. Meetings are real work. That work is frequently done poorly, but that’s an argument for getting better at it. Because that’s important work that needs to get done. Oh, also, those people doing glue work have real value.



Read the whole story
huskerboy
9 days ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete

PowerShell Architect Retires After Decades At the Prompt

2 Shares
Jeffrey Snover, the driving force behind PowerShell, has retired after a career that reshaped Windows administration. The Register reports: Snover's retirement comes after a brief sojourn at Google as a Distinguished Engineer, following a lengthy stint at Microsoft, during which he pulled the company back from imposing a graphical user interface (GUI) on administrators who really just wanted a command line from which to run their scripts. Snover joined Microsoft as the 20th century drew to a close. The company was all about its Windows operating system and user interface in those days -- great for end users, but not so good for administrators managing fleets of servers. Snover correctly predicted a shift to server datacenters, which would require automated management. A powerful shell... a PowerShell, if you will. [...] Over the years, Snover has dropped the occasional pearl of wisdom or shared memories from his time getting PowerShell off the ground. A recent favorite concerns the naming of Cmdlets and their original name in Monad: Function Units, or FUs. Snover wrote: "This abbreviation reflected the Unix smart-ass culture I was embracing at the time. Plus I was developing this in a hostile environment, and my sense of diplomacy was not yet fully operational." Snover doubtless has many more war stories to share. In the meantime, however, we wish him well. Many admins owe Snover thanks for persuading Microsoft that its GUI obsession did not translate to the datacenter, and for lengthy careers in gluing enterprise systems together with some scripted automation.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
huskerboy
9 days ago
reply
Seattle
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories